VASEP raises voice against US tax
In response to the DOC’s final decision that Vietnamese products will be taxed at 4.78% during the 10th administrative review (POR 10), Hoe said this was a significant increase compared with previous reviews.
Under the decision, the US had increased the duty rate for Vietnamese shrimp in POR10, from 0.91% in the POR9 to 4.78% at present, for both mandatory and voluntary businesses. Meanwhile, the tariff imposed on other Vietnamese firms or exporters not examined as mandatory or voluntary respondents in the POR10 remains at 25.76%.
 |
Hoe said one of the main reasons leading to the high tax at POR10 was that DOC utilised a zeroing method to determine dumping margins, which many foreign experts consider unfair. This method was inconsistent with the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), in which Vietnam and the US are both member countries.
With this ‘chink’, Hoe said VASEP was studying the ruling, to possibly issue a complaint to the US State Court of International Trade, in order to require DOC to rethink its calculation method of the anti-dumping tax rate in the POR10.
“We hope that with the WTO’s recent verdicts in applying price discrimination, Vietnamese businesses can reach a tax of zero% and prove that they have not sold shrimp at dumping prices in the US market,” said Hoe.
In the POR10, DOC continued to choose Bangladesh and India as the main reference countries to fix the prices of several input materials. The two countries do not have many similarities with Vietnam, leading to increased anti-dumping margins, said Hòe.
Chairman and Director of Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading Corporation, Tran Van Linh, said the DOC’s increase of the anti-dumping tax rate had caused difficulties for Vietnamese producers and shrimp farmers. With the current conditions, the cost of Vietnamese shrimp resulted in domestic producers is no longer able to compete with its rivals, such as Thailand, Indonesia, India and Ecuador.
He noted that although the country’s shrimp industry had been rapidly developing, it lacked independence and remained unsuitable for development because businesses had to import adult shrimp and feed. In addition, the rate of successfully raised shrimp in Vietnam was 30 to 35%, which is much lower than in rival countries.
As for domestic competition, Linh said Minh Phu Group was a giant in Vietnam. Its exports of shrimp to the US had accounted for nearly 30% of the country’s exports. The group did not have to suffer anti-dumping taxes from the US, making it very difficult for other Vietnamese companies to compete with Minh Phú.
“To maintain market share in the US market, businesses will have to continuously reduce prices, and finally shrimp farmers will have to bear heavy losses,” said Lĩnh.
According to statistics from VASEP, Vietnam has, so far, earned nearly US$600 million from the export of shrimp since early this year, resulting in a year-on-year increase of 14%. The export increased partly because of POR9’s lower tax rate of 0.91%.
The US is Vietnam’s largest importer of shrimp, accounting for 22.7% of export market share.
Hoe said the export of shrimp to the US did not only depend on low and high anti-dumping duties, but also other factors, such as quality, supply capacity, market situation and the supply-demand capacity of other export countries.
“Therefore, for the long-term, businesses and shrimp farmers need to set up a systematic plan for production, processing and consumption of high-quality product, as well as maintaining a stable number of customers. With this, it will not likely be affected by an anti-dumping tax or other technical barriers from import countries,” said Hoe.
VASEP predicted that the country’s export value would reach about US$3.2 billion this year, increasing by 11%, compared with last year
